Nothing to see here. Move along.

No, really… Nothing.

  • Flickr Photos

    Rusty dragon

    IMG00172.jpg

    IMG00170.jpg

    More Photos
  • RSS Some things in my RSS reader

    • What Does It Say When A Comedy Show Does More Fact Checking Than News Programs? November 20, 2009
      Poynter has an interesting article, looking at The Daily Show as being a leader in media criticism, an area where it does an excellent job, even if that's not its intention. But, what struck me most of all in the description of the team behind the show, was that it has a full-time researcher and fact-checker, who looks for multiple sources to verify the […]
      Mike Masnick
    • Comic for November 22, 2009 November 22, 2009
      Shared by wolfger Wow... Scott Adams apparently knows me, personally.
      (author unknown)
    • 689: Live Bait November 22, 2009
      http://www.GiantITP.com/comics/oots0689.html
      (author unknown)
    • Schlock Mercenary for Thursday, Nov 19 2009 November 20, 2009
      http://schlockmercenary.com/d/20091119.html
      (author unknown)
    • Prudence November 20, 2009
      (author unknown)
    • Michigan No Fault Law Update Should I Still Ride On The Shoulder? October 1, 2009
      Some of our readers may recall our article in the Spring 2002 issue of Michigan Bicyclist (http://www.lmb.org/pages/Resources/Legal/ShouldIRideontheShoulder.htm) in which we discussed whether or not cyclists were obligated to ride on the shoulder. It was our opinion then that it is good habit and common sense to ride on the shoulder if it is suitable. Suitab […]
      (author unknown)
    • Explore images with Google Image Swirl, now in Labs November 17, 2009
      Back in 2001, to give people a new, quicker way to find images, we launched Image Search. When you do a search for [eiffel tower] you'll find an array of images of the tower in the daytime, in black and white, at sunset and more. With Similar Images, which recently graduated from Google Labs, you can click "Find similar images" to narrow your […]
      A Googler
    • Calm and Pre-Orderly Fashion November 13, 2009
      admin
    • Finding the laws that govern us November 17, 2009
      As many of us recall from our civics lessons in school, the United States is a common law country. That means when judges issue opinions in legal cases, they often establish precedents that will guide the rulings of other judges in similar cases and jurisdictions. Over time, these legal opinions build, refine and clarify the laws that govern our land. For av […]
      A Googler
    • Untitled November 17, 2009
      Daniel Pipe
  • Recent songs (last.fm)

  • Some links I like

  • Subscribe

More proof that the terrorists won

Posted by wolfger on June 23, 2009

In the news yesterday is an alarmist article titled “People on terrorist watch list allowed to buy guns”. It should, more accurately, read “Innocent people allowed to buy guns”. Today CNN is running a poll asking if we think people on the watch list should be allowed to buy guns. Overwhelmingly (89%-11%) the answer is no. This is the wrong answer. A senator is introducing legislation to remove the right of these people to buy guns. But these people haven’t done anything wrong. They are not terrorists. They are suspects, but they are not even suspects of crimes committed, they are suspects of possible future crime. They are being denied their rights because of what they might do.

To put it in context: let’s say you are put on a list of those likely to have a fatal car accident, so you are forbidden to get a driver’s license, or buy a car. Is that right? Would that be acceptable if the list was 95% accurate? What if it was 50% accurate? How about 5% accurate? What percentage of the people on the terrorist watch list have actually committed or attempted to commit terrorism? I doubt those figures are public, but I can assure you the number is closer to 5 than 95. And for the record: car accidents kill far more Americans than either terrorists or guns do.

The ban would make no sense at any rate. Who is committing terrorism with guns? Planes, yes. Bombs, yes. Guns? Not so much. Guns are not the weapons of terror. Well, unless one is pointed right at you. But the point of terrorism is to scare people who are nowhere near the scene of the actual event. So clearly, if we’re taking freedoms away from innocent people in the name of fighting terror… the terrorists have succeeded. We are literally terrified beyond reason.

People on the list are an interesting group. As Bruce Schneier sums it up: They are too dangerous to let fly in an airplane, but too innocent to prosecute in a court of law. Where is the sense in that? Even some of our elected politicians have wound up with their names on the terrorist watch list. Of course, being well connected as they are, their names don’t stay there long. What about yours? And did you know that simply speaking out against the government can get you labeled a terrorist?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>